SuccessiveHalvingRegressor¶
Successive halving algorithm for regression.
Successive halving is a method for performing model selection without having to train each model on all the dataset. At certain points in time (called "rungs"), the worst performing will be discarded and the best ones will keep competing between each other. The rung values are designed so that at most budget
model updates will be performed in total.
If you have k
combinations of hyperparameters and that your dataset contains n
observations, then the maximal budget you can allocate is:
It is recommended that you check this beforehand. This bound can't be checked by the function because the size of the dataset is not known. In fact it is potentially infinite, in which case the algorithm will terminate once all the budget has been spent.
If you have a budget of B
, and that your dataset contains n
observations, then the number of hyperparameter combinations that will spend all the budget and go through all the data is:
Parameters¶
-
models
The models to compare.
-
metric
Type → metrics.base.Metric
Metric used for comparing models with.
-
budget
Type → int
Total number of model updates you wish to allocate.
-
eta
Default →
2
Rate of elimination. At every rung,
math.ceil(k / eta)
models are kept, wherek
is the number of models that have reached the rung. A highereta
value will focus on less models but will allocate more iterations to the best models. -
verbose
Default →
False
Whether to display progress or not.
-
print_kwargs
Extra keyword arguments are passed to the
print
function. For instance, this allows providing afile
argument, which indicates where to output progress.
Attributes¶
-
best_model
The current best model.
-
models
Examples¶
As an example, let's use successive halving to tune the optimizer of a linear regression. We'll first define the model.
from river import linear_model
from river import preprocessing
model = (
preprocessing.StandardScaler() |
linear_model.LinearRegression(intercept_lr=.1)
)
Let's now define a grid of parameters which we would like to compare. We'll try different optimizers with various learning rates.
from river import optim
from river import utils
models = utils.expand_param_grid(model, {
'LinearRegression': {
'optimizer': [
(optim.SGD, {'lr': [.1, .01, .005]}),
(optim.Adam, {'beta_1': [.01, .001], 'lr': [.1, .01, .001]}),
(optim.Adam, {'beta_1': [.1], 'lr': [.001]}),
]
}
})
We can check how many models we've created.
len(models)
10
We can now pass these models to a SuccessiveHalvingRegressor
. We also need to pick a
metric to compare the models, and a budget which indicates how many iterations to run
before picking the best model and discarding the rest.
from river import model_selection
sh = model_selection.SuccessiveHalvingRegressor(
models,
metric=metrics.MAE(),
budget=2000,
eta=2,
verbose=True
)
A SuccessiveHalvingRegressor
is also a regressor with a learn_one
and a predict_one
method. We can therefore evaluate it like any other classifier with
evaluate.progressive_val_score
.
from river import datasets
from river import evaluate
from river import metrics
evaluate.progressive_val_score(
dataset=datasets.TrumpApproval(),
model=sh,
metric=metrics.MAE()
)
[1] 5 removed 5 left 50 iterations budget used: 500 budget left: 1500 best MAE: 4.419643
[2] 2 removed 3 left 100 iterations budget used: 1000 budget left: 1000 best MAE: 2.392266
[3] 1 removed 2 left 166 iterations budget used: 1498 budget left: 502 best MAE: 1.541383
[4] 1 removed 1 left 250 iterations budget used: 1998 budget left: 2 best MAE: 1.112122
MAE: 0.490688
We can now view the best model.
sh.best_model
Pipeline (
StandardScaler (
with_std=True
),
LinearRegression (
optimizer=Adam (
lr=Constant (
learning_rate=0.1
)
beta_1=0.01
beta_2=0.999
eps=1e-08
)
loss=Squared ()
l2=0.
l1=0.
intercept_init=0.
intercept_lr=Constant (
learning_rate=0.1
)
clip_gradient=1e+12
initializer=Zeros ()
)
)
Methods¶
learn_one
Fits to a set of features x
and a real-valued target y
.
Parameters
- x — 'dict'
- y — 'base.typing.RegTarget'
predict_one
Predict the output of features x
.
Parameters
- x
Returns
The prediction.
-
Jamieson, K. and Talwalkar, A., 2016, May. Non-stochastic best arm identification and hyperparameter optimization. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (pp. 240-248). ↩
-
Li, L., Jamieson, K., Rostamizadeh, A., Gonina, E., Hardt, M., Recht, B. and Talwalkar, A., 2018. Massively parallel hyperparameter tuning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.05934. ↩
-
Li, L., Jamieson, K., DeSalvo, G., Rostamizadeh, A. and Talwalkar, A., 2017. Hyperband: A novel bandit-based approach to hyperparameter optimization. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18(1), pp.6765-6816. ↩